Comparisons

Side-by-side comparisons of commonly confused blood markers and compounds. Understand the key differences, when to use each, and what matters for bodybuilders.

Marker Comparisons

ALT vs AST

Marker

ALT and AST are both liver enzymes, but they have different tissue origins and clinical significance. Understanding the ALT/AST ratio helps distinguish liver damage from muscle damage.

Testosterone vs Free Testosterone

Marker

Total testosterone measures all circulating testosterone, while free testosterone measures only the unbound, biologically active fraction. For TRT patients and bodybuilders, free testosterone is often the more clinically relevant marker.

Ferritin vs Soluble Transferrin Receptor

Marker

Ferritin measures iron stores while soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) reflects iron demand at the cellular level. Together they distinguish between true iron deficiency, functional deficiency, and inflammation-driven ferritin elevation.

Haemoglobin vs Haematocrit

Marker

Both markers track red blood cell status, but haemoglobin measures oxygen-carrying protein concentration while haematocrit measures the volume fraction of red cells. On TRT, haematocrit is used more often for clinical decisions, but haemoglobin is more physiologically meaningful.

Testosterone vs DHT

Marker

Testosterone and DHT are both androgens, but they differ in potency, tissue selectivity, and clinical implications. Understanding the relationship between them is essential for managing TRT side effects.

HDL vs LDL

Marker

HDL and LDL are both cholesterol-carrying lipoproteins, but they perform opposite functions in the body and carry opposite implications for cardiovascular risk. Anabolic steroids simultaneously suppress HDL and elevate LDL, creating a double hit that dramatically accelerates atherosclerosis.

Total Cholesterol vs Non-HDL Cholesterol

Marker

Total cholesterol is the sum of all cholesterol fractions including the protective HDL. Non-HDL cholesterol subtracts HDL from total cholesterol to capture all atherogenic particles in a single number. Non-HDL is a more accurate cardiovascular risk predictor, particularly when triglycerides are elevated.

LH vs FSH

Marker

LH and FSH are both pituitary gonadotropins suppressed by AAS use, but they control different testicular functions and recover at different rates, making their distinction critical for PCT monitoring and fertility assessment.

Glucose vs HbA1c

Marker

Fasting glucose is a real-time snapshot of blood sugar, while HbA1c reflects your average glucose control over 2-3 months. For athletes using GH or peptides, both have strengths and blind spots.

RBC vs Haematocrit

Marker

RBC count measures the absolute number of red blood cells while haematocrit measures the proportion of blood volume they occupy. On cycle, these two markers can diverge in clinically meaningful ways: understanding each one separately prevents misinterpretation and guides better decisions about phlebotomy and hydration.

MCV vs RDW

Marker

MCV measures the average size of red blood cells while RDW measures the variation in their size. On cycle, these two indices combine to reveal iron depletion before ferritin drops to classically deficient levels, with RDW rising first as an early warning signal before MCV begins to fall.

LDL vs ApoB

Marker

LDL cholesterol measures the cholesterol content carried by LDL particles, while ApoB counts the actual number of atherogenic particles. In steroid users, ApoB is often a more accurate risk predictor because LDL can underestimate particle count when particles are small and dense.

Compound Comparisons

Testosterone Enanthate vs Testosterone Cypionate

Compound

Testosterone enanthate and testosterone cypionate are the two most commonly prescribed testosterone esters for TRT and bodybuilding. Their differences are minimal, and they are clinically interchangeable for most purposes.

Testosterone Enanthate vs Testosterone Propionate

Compound

Testosterone enanthate and testosterone propionate sit at opposite ends of the short-to-long ester spectrum. Enanthate offers stable levels with infrequent injections, while propionate demands daily or every-other-day dosing in exchange for rapid onset, faster clearance, and tighter hormonal control.

Testosterone Enanthate vs Testosterone Undecanoate

Compound

Testosterone enanthate and testosterone undecanoate represent fundamentally different approaches to TRT. Enanthate requires weekly or twice-weekly injections with rapid onset, while undecanoate (Nebido/Aveed) offers injections every 10 to 14 weeks but comes with a prolonged, complex loading phase and less predictable blood levels.

Testosterone Cypionate vs Testosterone Propionate

Compound

Testosterone cypionate is a long-acting ester suited to TRT and consistent bulking protocols, while testosterone propionate is a short-acting ester that demands frequent injections but offers faster onset, faster clearance, and more agile dose control.

Testosterone Cypionate vs Testosterone Undecanoate

Compound

Testosterone cypionate and injectable testosterone undecanoate (Nebido/Aveed) are both TRT formulations, but cypionate offers weekly dosing with rapid titration, while undecanoate provides quarterly injections at the cost of a complex loading phase, limited dose flexibility, and difficult blood test interpretation.

Testosterone Propionate vs Testosterone Undecanoate

Compound

Testosterone propionate and injectable testosterone undecanoate sit at opposite extremes of the ester spectrum. Propionate clears in days and demands daily injections, while undecanoate sustains levels for months with quarterly dosing. They are rarely compared clinically but represent the full range of injectable testosterone pharmacokinetics.

Clomiphene vs Enclomiphene

Compound

Clomiphene is a racemic mixture of two isomers with opposing effects, while enclomiphene is the pure active isomer. Enclomiphene provides equivalent LH/FSH stimulation with fewer estrogenic side effects, less SHBG elevation, and a cleaner side effect profile, making it the preferred choice when available.

HCG vs Enclomiphene

Compound

HCG and enclomiphene are both used to preserve fertility and testicular function during TRT, but they work through completely different mechanisms. HCG bypasses the pituitary and acts directly on testicular Leydig cells. Enclomiphene works at the pituitary by blocking estrogen feedback, raising both endogenous LH and FSH.

HCG vs Gonadorelin

Compound

HCG and gonadorelin both aim to maintain testicular function during TRT, but they act at different levels of the HPG axis. HCG acts directly on Leydig cells, bypassing the pituitary entirely. Gonadorelin acts on the pituitary as a GnRH analogue, stimulating endogenous LH and FSH release to maintain the complete downstream signalling cascade.

MK-677 (Ibutamoren) vs Ipamorelin

Compound

MK-677 (oral, 24-hour half-life, higher IGF-1 ceiling) vs ipamorelin (injectable, pulsatile, cleaner side-effect profile). The trade-off between convenience and metabolic safety.

MK-677 (Ibutamoren) vs Growth Hormone

Compound

MK-677 stimulates endogenous GH release (oral, lower ceiling, more insulin resistance per IU-equivalent). Exogenous GH bypasses the pituitary (injectable, no ceiling, dose-titratable, more expensive).

Compare your own blood test results

Upload blood tests to track and compare your marker values over time with AI-powered analysis.

Create Free Account